Those who scream the loudest". Please also specify which peer reviewed paper the judges have failed to consider in coming to their outcome or are you suggesting people and judges should simply use your comment as a test of veracity. I’m a scientist who worked with PCR data before. I never used Germano Sousa for blood tests and such; but they were my dentist clinic (near ALAMEDA metro station)up to beginning of March 2020. He failed to show what other "scientific evidence" of the high capacity of the virus to spread from “positive” cases to less than 25 cycles. It is stipulated that he is the owner of the network of laboratories. You might have been exposed to COVID-19 during your travels. Sign up now for a chance to win €100 of Amazon vouchers! Pittsburgh based GNC is now offering an at-home COVID-19 test kit, from a company called 1health. Please can you specify exactly who you worked for and in which capacity because you are very vague about your medical and scientific credentials and experience in contrast to this global team and to The Great Barrington Declaration scientists. 2. They had done so because one of the people had tested positive for Covid in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test – but the court had found the test fundamentally flawed and basically inadmissible. But it says in the *second sentence* that it's indeed pretty accurate. Passengers arriving to Portugal without a negative COVID 19 test results are subject to refusal of entry and/or mandatory testing at the cost of the passenger as well as quarantine until the results of the test. A viewer recovering from COVID … “The only element that appears in the proven facts is the performance of RT-PCR tests, one of which presented a positive result in relation to one of the applicants”, reads the document. After you travel, take the following steps to protect others from getting sick for 14 days after travel: Take these actions to protect others from getting sick: See CDC's After You Travel page for more information. According to the investigation, this only happens if the cycle threshold is higher than 35 "as it happens in most laboratories in the USA and Europe", reads the judgment. “The statement is false”, Vasco Barreto, a researcher at the Center for the Study of Chronic Diseases (Cedoc) of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the Universidade Nova de Lisboa told Público, who added that he believed the judges acted “irresponsibly”. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities”. Portugal has today recorded the highest number of daily deaths from Covid-19, accounting for 91 more deaths in the last 24 hours and a further 3,996 new cases of infection, according to the bulletin of the Directorate-General for Health ( DGS). For people interested in the background to the PCR criticism, see for instance "Scientist Demands Retraction of Original PCR Study" ( for a quick introduction to the specific form of PCR test (and why it is such a bad test!). Page 38 There is No pandemic! Cristiano Ronaldo has tested positive for COVID-19, the Portugal national team has confirmed. This is indicated in a scientific article that is cited in the judgment, but that has been read “completely wrong” by the magistrates, according to Germano de Sousa, former President of the Ordem dos Médicos and owner of a network of laboratories. If you must travel: Before you travel, get tested with a viral test 1–3 days before your trip. Meanwhile, the decision of the court has been damned by scientists in Portugal. In the case of the Públicio article: are they stating something "against" themselves or are they trying to avoid loss of face? This is because after our body controls the infection there are fragments of the virus's genetic material that persist and decrease over days, when the individual no longer poses a danger to others, ”explains Vasco Barreto. Ronaldo tests positive for coronavirus and will miss Portugal's game against Sweden. Too busy making the big buck on covid-19 testing. The BMJ is one of THE most prestigious scientific medical journals in the world. Which, together with the false positives gives a 100%. Will I have to take a Covid-19 PCR test? The need to show a negative coronavirus test on arriving or returning to European destinations is a growing trend, even sometimes for residents. Do not travel if your test result is positive; immediately isolate yourself, and follow public health recommendations. The results for … If you suspect that a traveler has COVID-19, see Information for Healthcare Professionals about Coronavirus (COVID-19) for information on evaluating, reporting, clinical care guidance, and infection control. If no, we can’t be sure if there’s none or just very little”. +351 282 341 201, All content and design is copyright Anglopress Lda and The News Group of Newspapers, Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates, Portugal to declare coronavirus health emergency, New potential lockdown decision “not before Friday”, EU wants to declare public health emergency in future outbreaks, Fewer Covid inpatients, but more patients in intensive care, Parliament votes to extend state of emergency until 7 January, Portugal calls to be removed from Swiss “Red” list, Government gives “green light” for Christmas, Controlled collapse of cliff in Albufeira, “Portugal has to create 25,000 qualified jobs by 2030”, Non-Habitual Residency Tax Still Offers Benefits with New Changes, Portugal in charge of deal with UK on fishing, Portuguese scheduling pre-Christmas Covid tests. 4. But taking any kind of Covid-19 test too early might miss an infection, said Dr. Frank Ong, chief medical and scientific officer at Everlywell. For this reason, some items on this page will be unavailable. Airports, bus stations, train stations, and rest stops are all places travelers can be exposed to the virus. Vasco Barreto's claim is very weak. He failed to give otherwise evidence. It's enough just to look at the numbers to understand why that is utterly stupid.). For more information about this message, please visit this page: Level 4: Very High Level of COVID-19 in Portugal, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. If you get sick in Portugal, you might need medical care. If you test positive on arrival, you might be required to isolate. Hear: " RT-PCR assays in the UK have analytical sensitivity and specificity of greater than 95%" Travel may increase your chance of getting and spreading COVID-19. Voir plus d'informations ci-dessous. Of course the scietntists and medical professionals who are working with pharmecutal companies and such will have a vested interest in keeping this plandemic alive, obviously they will fight back...but they will loose. " I am not concerned about having flu like symptoms which will result in no harm to me at all and unless you can prove that an asymptomatic person infects others with documented scientific peer reviewed studies, I believe this is disinformation. The two Portuguese judges whose 34-page ruling over a case of illegal confinement of German tourists in the Azores created ‘ructions’ for authorities’ ‘official narrative’ will not be ‘disciplined’ by their regulatory body. To Germano de Sousa clinic administrators, i have to quote s.o. Now, from reading the article, the judges conclude that “the probability of a person receiving a false positive is 97% or higher”. If yes, we how much? Last week, I reported on a landmark ruling from Portugal, where a court had ruled against a governmental health authority that had illegally confined four people to a hotel this summer. 12 Comments While the court has deemed the test to be unreliable, medical experts have hit back against these claims, stating the judges have acted “irresponsibly” in their ruling. Staying home is the best way to protect yourself and others from COVID-19. Dans ces conditions, l’isolement pourra durer de quelques jours à plusieurs semaines. Follow the Money. Portugal Coronavirus update with statistics and graphs: total and new cases, deaths per day, mortality and recovery rates, current active cases, recoveries, trends and timeline. It seems that the medical experts objecting to the Lisbon Court of Appeal Judgment are actually saying their information cannot withstand any evidential examination or testing by medical and science experts to be established for accuracy or truth. When low pretest probability exists, positive results should be interpreted with caution and a second specimen tested for confirmation. However, importantly, no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equates with infectivity unless infectious virus particles have been confirmed with laboratory culture based methods. Since the beginning of the pandemic, Portugal has registered 4,127 deaths and 274,011 cases of infection with the new coronavirus, 80,528 cases are now active, 96 more than on Tuesday. 1. COVID. You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link. If you must travel, talk to your doctor ahead of travel, especially if you are at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19. REUTERS/Rafael Marchante PCR tests have a result that answers “Could we detect genetic material in the sample? They have a lot more information on how currently "the science" used as excuse by politicians and journalists is really not doing anybody any favours at all! In the study cited, the relationship between the ability of the samples collected to infect cells and the number of cycles required to obtain a “positive” result was tested. Travelers should avoid all travel to Portugal. Here specificity means the ratio of *true* negatives. It must not be forgotten that covid19 infections are being equated with the possibility of other infections and quarantine, if the tests are remotely false let alone by 97%, such actions are not only reckless and irresponsible, the disproprortionate nature should also be examined as the measures against society are without complete justification. In addition, the Covid-19 test is available at select hospitals participating in the Portugal Health Passport. Well done Judges! Graca Freitas, 63, whose daily updates on the pandemic have made her a familiar face to the Portuguese public, tested positive on Tuesday and is in isolation, the … The judges quoted a paper published in The Lancet by Elena Surkova, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy and Francis Drobniewski, which stated: “Any diagnostic test result should be interpreted in the context of the pretest probability of disease. The initial decision, which was made on 11 November, related to an appeal by the Regional Health Administration of the Azores, following a request for habeas corpus - immediate release - of four German citizens who had been forced by the health authority to comply with isolation for 14 days in the hotel room. Another great resource is the document "PCR-based COVID testing has failed and is not a proper basis to lockdown the nation, let alone decide on tiers for restrictions - Briefing paper for MPs – 26 th November 2020" ( This information is considered to be inaccurate by Vasco Barreto, who states that where he works at Cedoc “42% of the positive tests, only 25 or less cycles were needed and there is scientific evidence of the high capacity of the virus to spread from “positive” cases to less than 25 cycles”. Do not travel if you are waiting for test results, test positive, or are sick. More Snakes in this article than a bag of Vipers. 3. CDC twenty four seven. To suggest the information is not examined, is not only unethical but against justice, human rights and the rule of law. If you don't get tested, it's safest to stay home for 10 days after travel. With the country assailed daily by news of rising case numbers, judges in Lisbon have described the reliability of tests being rolled out in their tens of thousands as “more than debatable”. Tests for viral presence are used to diagnose individual cases and to allow public health authorities to trace and contain outbreaks. The other study cited in the judgement was Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates, whose results were published by Oxford Academic in late September. Because it’s a scam! According to the process: “There is no evidence that this diagnosis was actually carried out by a professional qualified under the Law and who had acted in accordance with good medical practices”. else´s words "Avoid greed, for greed in itself is poverty.".

Psg Boutique Masque, Chanson Johnny Prénom, Hotel Paris Luxe, Destockage électroménager 94, Restaurant Annemasse La Fourchette, Service Client Mobilier De France, Code Postal 69000, Mulhouse -- Wikipédia,